An Overview of Hindfoot Pain and MRI Findings

pdf path

Image Gallery

Heel pain is a common complaint among the general population and is present in 1 of 8 individuals, particularly those over age 50.1 Additionally, heel pain is one of the most prevalent complaints necessitating referral to a foot specialist. There are multiple etiologies for heel pain, which generally originates from 6 major anatomic structures: the plantar fascia, calcaneus, tarsal tunnel, tendons, bursae, and plantar fat pad.2

This article will review the differential diagnosis for hindfoot pain as well as discuss pertinent MRI findings for each condition.

Plantar Fascia

The plantar fascia is a fibrous aponeurosis that arises along the medial calcaneal tuberosity.2 From the calcaneus, the plantar fascia divides into the medial, central, and lateral components (Figure 1).

The central band is the largest, adhering to the undersurface of the flexor digitorum brevis. At the midsole, the central band divides into 5 superficial and deep components extending toward the digits as the flexor tendons. This, along with the medial and lateral marginal superficial tracts, inserts onto each proximal phalanx. The plantar fascia plays a significant role in longitudinal arch support.

Plantar Fasciitis

Plantar fasciitis is one of the more common causes of plantar heel pain.3,4 Plantar fasciitis is related to microtrauma at the os calcis attachment and can result from repetitive trauma, enthesopathy, pes planus, pes cavus, or heel cord contractures. Stress-related trauma is the most common etiology and usually affects obese middle-age or elderly patients.5 Imaging-related findings for fasciitis include thickening of the plantar fascia (> 6 mm) at the proximal attachment and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences with low to intermediate signal on T1-weighted sequences (Figure 2).6

Plantar Fascia Tear

A fascial tear is usually traumatic in etiology with sudden onset and localized tenderness. Fascial tears are comonly seen in running or jumping athletes.7 Imaging findings of acute tears will demonstrate a partial or full-thickness defect of the fascia with focal hyperintense signal on T2-weighted or short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences.7 Peri-fascial fluid-like signal can also be seen (Figure 3).

Plantar Fibromatosis

Plantar fibromatosis (Ledderhose disease) is a fibroproliferative disorder in which benign fibrous nodules develop within the plantar fascia.8 Plantar fibromatosis can be associated with many other fibroproliferative disorders such as Dupuytren disease and Peyronie disease.9 Plantar fibromatosis usually involves the more distal fascia and the central or medial bands. Imaging findings of plantar fibromatosis show nodular-thickening of the nonweight-bearing portions of the plantar fascia, which is hypointense on both T1- and proton density (PD)-weighted sequences (Figure 4). Hyperintense signal of the adjacent subcutaneous soft-tissues on T2- or PD-weighted sequences can also be seen.

There are multiple treatment options for plantar fibromatosis, which include surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, used alone or in combination. The treatment is determined based on disease aggressiveness, patient age, and the risk of disability with resection. Surgical resection is the most common treatment; however, recurrence rates are high and can be deforming, even requiring amputation in some cases. If there is a possibility of functional loss, marginal excision and postoperative radiation therapy can be used. In the case of severe neurovascular or significant limb involvement, chemotherapy and radiation are often the sole option for treatment. Chemotherapy alone can also be used in young children to avoid disfiguring surgery and complications of radiation.8


The calcaneus is responsible for significant axial load-bearing forces and is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone, responsible for up to 60% of all tarsal bone fractures in adults.10

Calcaneal Stress Fracture

Most stress fractures result from repetitive activity as opposed to direct trauma. Thus, calcaneal stress fractures are common in patients undergoing a new occupation or repetitive motions (ie, military recruits or runners). Stress fractures are further classified as fatigue fracture (overuse in normal bone) or insufficiency fracture (normal use in abnormal bone).2 Conditions related to insufficiency fractures include those that weaken the bone integrity such as metabolic disorders, inflammatory conditions, bone dysplasias, and neurological disorders.11

Calcaneal stress fractures are a cause of hindfoot pain that is commonly not visualized or radiographically occult, especially in the early stages. Reported radiographic sensitivity for the diagnosis of lower extremity stress fractures ranges from 12% to 56% with a specificity of 88% to 96%. MRI sensitivity and specificity for detecting stress fracture can be as high as 99% and 97%, respectively.12 MRI demonstrates linear hypointense signal in bone marrow on T1-weighted images, which extends to the cortex with surrounding increased marrow signal on T2-weighted and STIR sequences (Figure 5)13 Calcaneal stress fractures are more common in the posterior calcaneus.

Tarsal Tunnel and Nerve Entrapment

Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome

The tarsal tunnel is a fibro-osseous canal in the medial aspect of the ankle, which is a common location for compression and entrapment of neurovascular structures. The tarsal tunnel contains the tibialis posterior (TP) tendon, flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon, posterior tibial artery/vein and tibial nerve, and the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. The tarsal tunnel is created by the medial talar wall, the sustentaculum tali, and the medial calcaneal wall. The flexor retinaculum forms the roof of the tarsal tunnel (Figure 6).2

Tarsal tunnel syndrome results from neuropathic entrapment or compression within the tunnel. The posterior tibial nerve and its branches can be compressed as it passes through the fibro-osseous tunnel, deep to the flexor retinaculum. Patients suffering from tarsal tunnel syndrome generally experience pain and sensory deficits.14

Numerous etiologies can cause tarsal tunnel syndrome with up to 40% of cases being idiopathic, and less likely etiologies including ganglion cysts, tenosynovitis, varicosities, and osseous deformities.2 The patient’s symptoms can suggest the location of nerve entrapment as well as the branch of the posterior tibial nerve that is involved. For example, medial plantar nerve entrapment can occur at the tarsal tunnel or distally. These patients usually present with heel or arch pain. The lateral plantar nerve is also commonly entrapped at the tarsal tunnel or distal to the tarsal tunnel with loss of sensation along the distal third of the foot.

Imaging findings of tarsal tunnel syndrome depend on underlying etiology. Space-occupying lesions are well depicted on MRI, such as varicosities (Figure 7) and a large aneurysmal bone cyst of the talus causing mass effect on the tarsal tunnel (Figure 8).

Baxter Neuropathy

Baxter neuropathy is a syndrome caused by the entrapment of the inferior calcaneal nerve.15 The inferior calcaneal nerve is the first branch of the lateral calcaneal nerve, which if entrapped, can result in chronic heel pain often mimicking plantar fasciitis. Entrapment of the inferior calcaneal nerve occurs at 3 locations in the hindfoot: the medial border of the quadratus plantae muscle, along the fascial edge of an enlarged/hypertrophied abductor hallucis muscle, and most commonly at the medial calcaneal tuberosity. Imaging findings are usually related to denervation with increased signal intensity or atrophy of the intrinsic muscles of the foot. Incidental atrophy of the abductor digiti minimi likely reflects a prior clinically missed entrapment (Figure 9) and is not an uncommon finding.16,17


Tendons normally have a homogenous hypointense signal on all MRI sequences within the hindfoot.18 The main tendons of the hindfoot include the peroneus longus, peroneus brevis, Achilles, posterior tibial, FDL, and FHL tendons.  

Achilles Tendon

The Achilles tendon is formed by the communion of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. The tendon inserts at the posterior calcaneus, os calcis. The Achilles tendon normally has a concave anterior and posterior convex contour and has low signal intensity on all sequences. Thickness of the tendon averages 6 mm.19,20 A common normal finding is linear or punctate increased signal intensity on low echo time (TE) sequences, usually more anterior within the tendon. This signal represents normal fascicular anatomy but can be mistaken for interstitial tears, therefore knowing this common appearance and location is imperative (Figure 10).21,22 Achilles tendinopathy or tendinosis can be insertional or mid-substance. Non-insertional tendinosis is usually acute in onset and often proximal to the retrocalcaneal bursa. This entity usually occurs in older individuals who are less active and overweight.23,24 Insertional tendinopathy results from repetitive trauma and micro tears which usually present with weight-bearing pain in less athletic or active individuals and more commonly associated with running and jumping.2,23,24 Imaging findings on MR will demonstrate focal or fusiform thickening with diffuse or linear low to intermediate signal on fluid sensitive sequences (Figures 11 and 12). The Achilles tendon is unique as it does not have a true synovial sheath. However, it does have a thin sheath-like structure surrounding the tendon that is separated from the tendon by a lubricating layer of mucopolysaccharides. This structure is called the paratenon. Similar to tenosynovitis, with overuse the paratenon can become inflamed and cause pain. This is called paratenonitis (Figure 11).

Achilles ruptures, or complete tears, usually occur from 25-40 years of age. Activities that require dorsiflexed position while running or jumping are at a greater risk. Complete tears will demonstrate a T2-hyperintense signal defect of the tendon (Figure 13). Partial or complete retraction of fibers can be seen, depending on the degree of tearing. Chronic tendon pathology may lack intrasubstance signal but can be diffuse or focally thickened.25

Tibialis Posterior, Flexor Digitorum Longus, and Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendons

The FDL and FHL tendons course through a shallow groove in the posteromedial aspect of the talus and continue under the sustentaculum tali. On the plantar aspect of the heel, the FHL tendon crosses deep to the FDL tendon at the Master Knot of Henry, before their insertion on the base of the great toe and lesser distal phalanges, respectively.26 The TP tendon originates at the posterior tibia, fibula, and interosseous membrane. From its origin it courses along the deep posterior compartment of the lower leg, through the tarsal tunnel, under and around the medial malleolus and into its insertion at the plantar aspect of the navicular, cuneiforms, and metatarsal bases.27

The TP, FDL, and FHL tendons are prone to tendonitis and tenosynovitis, which results in a painful posteromedial heel. These findings are more commonly seen in athletes performing repetitive forceful push off motion with the forefoot. Tenosynovitis is demonstrated by increased fluid-like signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences distending the tendon sheath (Figures 14 and 15).2 However, it is important to note that fluid in the FHL tendon sheath may be considered physiologic if similar to the volume of intraarticular fluid, as these structures often communicate.

Peroneus Longus and Brevis Tendons

The peroneus longus and brevis tendons course along a groove posterior to the fibula in the lateral ankle and curve anteroinferiorly along the undersurface of the foot. The peroneus longus inserts on the medial cuneiform and the base of the first metatarsal. The peroneus brevis inserts on the base of the fifth metatarsal. The peroneal tendons are also susceptible to tendonitis and tenosynovitis. Repetitive acute tenosynovitis can result in fibrous scar formation in the tendinous sheath, known as stenosing tenosynovitis. Imaging findings of stenosing tenosynovitis will demonstrate an intermediate signal intensity rind surrounding the tendon on both the T1- and T2-weighted sequences (Figures 16 and 17).


There are two bursae of the hindfoot lying near the insertion of the Achilles tendon to the calcaneus. The retrocalcaneal bursa is located between the Achilles tendon insertion and the calcaneus. The retroachilles bursa (or subcutaneous calcaneal bursa) is situated between the skin and the Achilles tendon.28 On MRI a normal retrocalcaneal bursa is usually present and measures < 6 mm in the transverse plane and 1 mm in the anterior-posterior dimension.29 When these bursae become inflamed, they can generally be seen as uninterrupted MRI fluid-like signal in the expected locations of the bursae.

Haglund Syndrome

A Haglund deformity is a prominent bursal bony projection of the calcaneus, which can be a normal anatomical structure or associated with other findings.30 Haglund syndrome is the result of both soft tissue and osseous abnormalities consisting of a Haglund deformity, insertional tendinopathy, and pre-Achilles and/or retrocalcaneal bursitis. This entity is commonly associated with low-back or high-heel shoes.30 The imaging findings of Haglund syndrome include a prominent posterosuperior tuberosity of the calcaneus with or without increased marrow signal on the fluid-sensitive sequences, fluid-like signal within the pre-Achilles or retro-Achilles bursa, increased signal on T2/STIR sequences in the Kager (pre-Achilles) fat pad, and insertional tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon (Figure 18).

Retroachilles and Retrocalcaneal Bursitis

Bursitis in the retroachilles and retrocalcaneal bursa is most commonly a manifestation of Achilles pathology but can also occur as a separate entity. One of the more common causes of retroachilles and retrocalcaneal bursitis is repetitive trauma or friction. Bursitis can also be seen in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthropathies. The retrocalcaneal bursa should measure < 1-2 mm in anteroposterior dimension. If enlarged, it may represent disease, especially if surrounding edematous changes are present. The subcutaneous fat should be seen between the Achilles tendon and the skin. If this fat cannot be seen on MRI, a blister or retro-Achilles bursitis may be present. In particular, retro-Achilles bursitis is distinguished by edematous changes without mass effect on the skin.2

Plantar Fat Pad

The heel fat pad is composed of elastic fibrous septae with closely packed fat cells that act as a shock-absorber for the heel. Several plantar fat pad pathologies such as ulcers, abrasions and contusions can be identified with a detailed history and physical examination. However, the use of MRI is sometimes required to provide a differential diagnosis for heel pad abnormalities that cannot be explained clinically. Numerous causes of heel pain can arise from the fat pad, including infection, trauma (rupturing of the septa), neoplasm, inflammatory conditions, and rheumatoid nodules.

Rheumatoid nodules of the heel pad occur in 20% of patients who test positive for rheumatoid factor.2 Rheumatoid nodules usually develop on the pressure areas in the heel, but may occur near the Achilles tendon insertion. Imaging findings are related to their histologic composition. Solid nodules are composed of chronic inflammatory cells and usually show decreased signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted sequences with postcontrast enhancement. Nodules can have central necrosis with increased signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences and peripheral enhancement (Figure 19).31


Heel pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint for presentation to primary care or a foot specialist, and the specific etiology is often difficult to ascertain clinically. The heel is a complex area to assess with numerous sources of pain. However, compartmentalizing the heel into different anatomic structures and understanding the imaging findings and differential diagnoses for each location will help guide the clinician to a more accurate diagnosis and earlier treatment.


  1. Chatterton BD, Muller S, Roddy E. Epidemiology of posterior heel pain in the general population: cross-sectional findings from the clinical assessment study of the foot. Arthritis Care Res 2015;67(7):996-1003.
  2. Narváez JA, Narváez J, Ortega R, Aguilera C, Sánchez A, Andía E. Painful Heel: MR Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2000;20(2):333-352.
  3. Thompson JV, Saini SS, Reb CW, Daniel JN. Diagnosis and management of plantar fasciitis. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2014;114(12):900-906.
  4. Young C. Plantar fasciitis. Ann Intern Med 2012;156(1_Part_1):ITC1.
  5. Schepsis AA, Leach RE, Gorzyca J. Plantar fasciitis. Etiology, treatment, surgical results, and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(266):185-196.
  6. Berkowitz JF, Kier R, Rudicel S. Plantar fasciitis: MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179(3):665-667.
  7. Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Farooki S, Kakitsubata Y, Resnick D. Disorders of the plantar aponeurosis. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(1):97-104.
  8. Robbin MR, Murphey MD, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ, Choi JJ. Imaging of musculoskeletal fibromatosis. Radiographics 2001;21(3):585-600.
  9. Van Der Bauwhede J. Ledderhose disease: plantar fibromatosis. Wheeless’ Textbook of Orthopaedics. 2007.
  10. Egol K, Koval KJ, Zuckerman J. Handbook of Fractures. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  11. Peris P. Stress fractures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17(6):1043-1061.
  12. Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Lenchik L, Kuhn KJ, Santiago L, Smoliga JM. Diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities for suspected lower extremity stress fractures: a systematic review with evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. Am J Sports Med 2016;44(1):255-263.
  13. Stress fractures in the foot and ankle. Radsource. Published August 1, 2016. Accessed January 3, 2018.
  14. Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS, Cavalcanti CF. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity. Radiographics 2010;30(4):1001-1019.
  15. Baxter’s Nerve (First Branch of the Lateral Plantar Nerve) Impingement - Radsource. Radsource. Published August 1, 2012. Accessed November 27, 2018.
  16. Schmid DT, Hodler J, Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CWA, Espinosa N, Zanetti M. Fatty muscle atrophy: prevalence in the hindfoot muscles on MR images of asymptomatic volunteers and patients with foot pain. Radiology 2009;253(1):160-166.
  17. Recht MP, Grooff P, Ilaslan H, Recht HS, Sferra J, Donley BG. Selective atrophy of the abductor digiti quinti: an MRI study. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(3):W123-W127.
  18. Hodgson RJ, O’Connor PJ, Grainger AJ. Tendon and ligament imaging. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1016): 1157-1172.
  19. Achilles Tendon Pathology - Radsource. Radsource. Published January 3, 2017. Accessed January 9, 2018.
  20. Koivunen-Niemelä T, Parkkola K. Anatomy of the Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) with respect to tendon thickness measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 1995;17(3):263-268.
  21. Mantel D, Flautre B, Bastian D, Delforge PM, Delvalle A, Leclet H. [Structural MRI study of the Achilles tendon. Correlation with microanatomy and histology]. J Radiol 1996;77(4):261-265.
  22. Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(3):613-625.
  23. Irwin TA. Current concepts review: insertional achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31(10):933-939.
  24. Chimenti RL, Cychosz CC, Hall MM, Phisitkul P. Current concepts review update: insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38(10):1160-1169.
  25. Lawrence DA, Rolen MF, Morshed KA, Moukaddam H. MRI of heel pain. Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(4):845-855.
  26. Stoller DW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  27. Thompson JC, Netter FH. Netter’s Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy. Teterboro, NJ: Icon Learning Systems; 2002.
  28. Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR. MRI of the Achilles tendon: a comprehensive review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and imaging of overuse tendinopathies. Acta Radiol. 2010;51(4):438-454.
  29. Bottger BA, Schweitzer ME, El-Noueam KI, Desai M. MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170(5):1239-1241.
  30. Pavlov H, Heneghan MA, Hersh A, Goldman AB, Vigorita V. The Haglund syndrome: initial and differential diagnosis. Radiology 1982;144(1):83-88.
  31. el-Noueam KI, Giuliano V, Schweitzer ME, O’Hara BJ. Rheumatoid nodules: MR/pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21(5):796-799.
Back To Top

Cheney D, Smith C, Brooks D, von Borstel D.  An Overview of Hindfoot Pain and MRI Findings.  J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol.  2019;8(4):11-17.

Categories:  Section

About the Author

Dustin Cheney, D.O., Cameron Smith, D.O., Damon Brooks, D.O., Donald von Borstel, D.O.

Dustin Cheney, D.O., Cameron Smith, D.O., Damon Brooks, D.O., Donald von Borstel, D.O.

Department of Radiology, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK


Copyright © The American College of Osteopathic Radiology 2023
    Agility CMS